[Issue 24805] The spec should not refer to default initialization as default construction when discussing disabling it
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
Sun Oct 13 09:48:41 UTC 2024
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24805
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan M Davis <issues.dlang at jmdavisProg.com> ---
I've e-mailed Walter for clarification on this. It appears that the compiler's
error messages are in agreement with the terminology used in the spec. So, the
current terminology may very well be what Walter wants to use in spite of the
fact that we don't have default constructors, and we normally talk about
structs being default-initialized rather than default-constructed, because we
don't have default constructors, and the mechanics are different.
--
More information about the Digitalmars-d-bugs
mailing list