FLTK native in 'D'. Would that be useful?

[Derek Parnell]

On Sat, 22 Jul 2006 05:17:16 +1000, matthiasm  
<matthiasm_member at pathlink.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I am one of the co-authors of FLTK. I like 'D' and as a test I have  
> manually
> translated parts of FLTK into
> native 'D' code. This is obvioulsy very different from just writing a  
> wrapper,
> more involved, but also
> more rewarding.
>
> Before I jump into manually porting a few hundred thousand lines of  
> code, I
> would really like to know
> first if the 'D' community is interested in such a thing at all and if I  
> can get
> sufficient support and a
> reasonable number of users.
>
> What do you folks think?

Yes! THIS WOULD BE USEFUL, he exclaims :-)

There would be any number of good, experienced D people to help with the  
porting issues that arise.

-- 
Derek Parnell
Melbourne, Australia