dwt-linux with ldc successfully built

["Jérôme M. Berger"]

Spacen Jasset wrote:
> Gian Perrone wrote:
>> Frank Benoit schrieb:
>>> Thats good news. How long was the compile time? How big the executable?
>>
>> real 9m16.925s
>> user 67m34.623s
>> sys 4m28.682s
>>
>> That was on a dual Xeon quad core platform (= 8 cores) 2.5GHz via SSH, 
>> because on my laptop it was way to slow to repeat changing one code 
>> line and compiling again.
>>
>> I remember compiling DWT 3.4-1 on my dual-core laptop with an old dmd 
>> version in 6 seconds.
>>
>> libDO-dwt.a is just 279M (remember, w/o browser and internals.mozilla) 
>> and simple just 11M...
> 
> How come the user time is more than the real time? Is the real time not 
> the wall clock difference?

	Yes, but the user time is the time spent in user code on each CPU 
or Core. So if you spend 1min at 100% on two cores, you get 2min of 
user time and 1min of real time.

		Jerome
-- 
mailto:jeberger at free.fr
http://jeberger.free.fr
Jabber: jeberger at jabber.fr

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.puremagic.com/pipermail/digitalmars-d-dwt/attachments/20091011/5fe86dd8/attachment.pgp>