Atom IDE
anonymous via Digitalmars-d-ide
digitalmars-d-ide at puremagic.com
Fri Jul 31 06:41:32 PDT 2015
On Friday, 31 July 2015 at 12:35:11 UTC, WebFreak001 wrote:
> On Friday, 31 July 2015 at 03:09:00 UTC, anonymous wrote:
>> On Thursday, 30 July 2015 at 22:18:20 UTC, WebFreak001 wrote:
>>> We (me and Wild) are currently working on a plugin for atom
>>> that should take over the job of everything for D. Right now
>>> we have already added snippets, syntax highlighting (from
>>> atom-language-d) and auto complete using DCD.
>>>
>>> If you would like to try it or to help us just get it from
>>> here: https://github.com/Vild/atomize-d
>>>
>>> Full TODO: https://trello.com/b/eR18xRBz/atomize-d
>>
>> I'm curious to know if this kind of editors (the program
>> itself based on scripts and regexes for highlighting) are
>> fast, compared to compiled programs, for example when loading
>> std.sdatetime ? Does it lags a lot, (eg add a /++ at line
>> 1000) ?
>
> Probably slower than a compilied program but the plugin itself
> only uses asynchronous operations for auto completion
It was just an example, i was just asking subtily if these kind
of programs (Atom, IntelliJ) works fine with source composed by
several hundred of LOC.
For instance, std.datetime is 30K.SLOC so it's generally a good
source file to know if an editor rocks.
More information about the Digitalmars-d-ide
mailing list