Intellisense madness
Rainer Schuetze via Digitalmars-d-ide
digitalmars-d-ide at puremagic.com
Thu Jan 26 00:28:41 PST 2017
On 13.01.2017 21:36, Ignacious wrote:
> I'm sure this has been brought up before... but having intellisense list
> all available accessors in a flat sorted list is madness! It prevents
> one from quickly seeing what kind of accessors a type has if they are
> not familiar with the type.
>
> Surely it would not be difficult to list the direct accessors of a type
> at the top of the list? Or, at the very list, list any generic accessors
> in their own group.
>
> If the coding is too difficult a simple resolution is this:
>
> Take the generic accessors that work on any type and put them at the
> bottom of the list(or color them red or something). This can be done
> easily by just getting the intellisense results off an empty type such
> as Object behind the scenes once and then matching them against the type
> being accessed at hand. Since D has many built in generic accessors, it
> bloats the list with junk that I don't need to see most of the time.
>
> In Visual D, intellisense is nearly useless for me. It obfuscates rather
> than helps.
>
> Thanks for investigating this! ;)
>
It never actually bothered me, but I agree a better sorting might be
preferable. There is little access to the layout of the completion box,
but the order and the text color can be changed. I'll look into this...
More information about the Digitalmars-d-ide
mailing list