Merge of 2.066.0

[David Nadlinger via digitalmars-d-ldc]

On 4 Sep 2014, at 18:08, Kai Nacke via digitalmars-d-ldc wrote:
> I did not follow the discussion about the regressions but my 
> understanding is that most of them are problems in the semantic phase. 
> Then LDC is affected.

This is true. However, as most of the regressions are already fixed on 
the 2.066 branch, we can simply merge the head of the branch instead (or 
wait for 2.066.1) before folding the changes into LDC master.

Best,
David