Version number: Are we ready for 1.0?
Jacob Carlborg via digitalmars-d-ldc
digitalmars-d-ldc at puremagic.com
Fri Apr 17 01:38:35 PDT 2015
On 2015-04-17 07:19, Kai Nacke wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> The major D compilers are currently:
>
> dmd 2.067
> gdc 4.8.4
> ldc 0.15.1
>
> Looks like ldc is still in its early stages. Given the fact that ldc is
> more then 10 years old (see David's presentation at DConf'13) then this
> does not really reflect the state of ldc.
>
> I like to do something about the version number. Possible plans I
> identified are:
>
> - The 2.067 merge gets version 0.99.0 and with the 2.068 move on to 1.0.0.
> (First version with D code in the frontend!)
>
> - Just drop 0. Next version is 16.0
>
> Any opinions or better ideas?
Are there any plans on how the versioning scheme should look like? I.e.
how and when a version number is incremented.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
More information about the digitalmars-d-ldc
mailing list