lld-link should tolerate foo.o

[kinke]

On Thursday, 10 January 2019 at 11:58:48 UTC, kinke wrote:
> On Thursday, 10 January 2019 at 10:46:27 UTC, V V Kozlov wrote:
>> Shouldn't this tolerate .o files?  (Clang does)
>
> I don't think so.

I checked; both MS link.exe and lld-link support *.o just fine. 
LDC's supported file extensions depend on the target (e.g., it 
rejects .o for Windows targets and .obj for non-Windows ones).