Testers required for tool for LDC - asm_parse
Cecil Ward
cecil at cecilward.com
Thu Jul 6 23:01:19 UTC 2023
On Thursday, 6 July 2023 at 21:43:18 UTC, kinke wrote:
> I think adding symbol-names support in LDC directly would be
> quite straight-forward - by replacing the symbol names in the
> assembly template string with the operand's underlying numeric
> ID. See
> https://github.com/ldc-developers/ldc/blob/d4f2bed3a45688b32434d429e39c22dea5a9ffda/gen/asm-gcc.cpp#L186-L196. The raw string would be `insn`.
Indeed, that’s what I did, that and removing the name definitions
from inside the constraint blocks. It turned out to be a pain to
parse the whole thing properly though, and as I’m both very rusty
and very unwell it took me quite a while. The forum was extremely
helpful.
More information about the digitalmars-d-ldc
mailing list