relaxed memory model function attribute

[sexdollhoney]

On Wednesday, 31 July 2024 at 15:32:48 UTC, Bruce Carneal wrote:
> On Wednesday, 31 July 2024 at 10:16:57 UTC, kinke wrote:
>> [...]
>
> Not a good idea eh?  Well, using the alternative available 
> today extensively I disagree.  The use case is for @safe 
> performance critical programming where the compiler can not 
> readily determine the aliasing (you'll see some code expansion 
> in current LDC for very simple cases where the generated code 
> first proves independence).
>
> Still, thanks for the response.  I'll stick with the 
> manual/@trusted nested functions workaround.  It is *much* 
> better than nothing, having allowed me to ditch my entire 
> explicit SIMD code base.  Well, almost everything.  I still 
> have need for an efficient mapping of conditionals to bit 
> vectors and don't know how to do that without dropping into 
> SIMD land.

I love your [url=https://sexdollhoney.com]content[/url]