demangle and mangleof

[John Reimer]

Don Clugston wrote:
> Bradley Smith wrote:
>>
>> Does it seem reasonable that the demangle() function should work for 
>> the .mangleof property?
> 
> It seems very reasonable to me. I have implemented compile-time demangle 
> metafunctions:
> 
> static assert( prettynameof!(A)    == "class main.A" );
> static assert( qualifiednameof!(A) == "main.A" );
> static assert( symbolnameof!(A)    == "A" );
> 
> When doing this, I found some mistakes in the name mangling docs, and 
> I'm pretty sure that my code is much more comprehensive than std.demangle.
> 
> A really old version of the code is in dsource.ddl.meta, but it was 
> ugly, and improvements to the template system have broken it. I'll post 
> my new version soon (was working on it today, still fails in a few cases).
> 


I eagerly await your improvements. :)

-JJR