The scope of scope(exit)

[James Dunne]

Derek Parnell wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Mar 2006 12:58:08 +1100, Derek Parnell wrote:
> 
> Oops , should have read ...
> 
> but expected ...
>  
>    Foo IN 1 OUT 10
>    Foo IN 7 OUT 7
> 
> 

Putting the return in the scope(exit) block fixes the problem. 
Interesting, but not unexpected.  I'd say this way provides more 
flexibility, but also may cause confusion (as it just did).

-- 
Regards,
James Dunne