-unittest and main
Chris Nicholson-Sauls
ibisbasenji at gmail.com
Tue Nov 7 21:52:26 PST 2006
Bill Baxter wrote:
> I find it inconvenient that -unittest doesn't automatically supply a
> main() if there isn't one. For instance if I just want to test one
> module of my library I end up going into the code, adding "void
> main(){}" and then "dmd -unittest -run module" then go back and remove
> the "void main(){}" line.
>
> Ideally dmd would just realize that if there's no main and I'm doing
> -unittest, it should add one for me.
>
> Second best would be a -main flag that says 'create a trivial main for
> me' so I could say "dmd -unittest -main -run module".
>
> Is there some other way to do this that I'm missing?
>
> --bb
None that I haven't missed as well. Some of us have been wanting a feature like your
'-main' switch for some time now. (Or at the very least for -unittest to implicitly
behave this way.)
-- Chris Nicholson-Sauls
More information about the Digitalmars-d-learn
mailing list