Is this a bug or feature?

[BCS]

Reply to Kirk,

> BCS wrote:
>
> Method literals, eh? Nifty.
>

Not just methods:

int[] foo;

(&foo).{
	int ret = 0;
	foreach(int i; *this) ret += i;
	return ret;
}

maybe even anything that can fit int a size_t (byte, short, int)

Why not interface literals?

interface I { int foo(); }
struct S    { int i; }

auto a = new S;
I i = s.I   // I don't like the syntax, but...
{
	int foo()
	{
		return this.i;
	}
}

Of course this requiters that interfaces be re implemented using context/v-table 
pairs, but that is an old soap-box.