Extending basic types - bool

[Johan Granberg]

inteja wrote:

> %u Wrote:
> 
>> Frits van Bommel Wrote:
>> > The operators !, ., &&, ||, ?:, and a few others will likely never be
>> > overloadable.
>> This was set up long before Walter implemented lazy evaluation. Now that
>> D has lazy evaluation it should be easy to make at least &&, || and ?:
>> overloadable.
> 
> But even if possible, wouldn;t this conflict with what Frits also said
> i.e. "The reason is likely that those operators already have a definition
> when used with a class instance."?
> 
> If it is technically feasible, I guess we need to wait for clarification
> from Walter?
> 
> 
> inteja.

Instead of overloading logical operator which can be confusing, couldn't
there be an opTrue operator or somthing similar merging several operators
into one in the same way as opCompare.