Why the compiler dosen't enforce correct module declarations?

[Ary Manzana]

Thanks for all your answers.

I'll follow Daniel's advice.

Ary Manzana escribió:
> Manfred Nowak escribió:
>> Ary Manzana wrote
>>
>>> Why use an alternative of the built-in version system?
>>
>> The version system is not equivalent to the module naming system.
> 
> Ok. My point is that it is totaly unnecessary to have the module 
> declaration say something different than it's location relative to the 
> include source path. This is like things work in Java, for example: you 
> get an error if the package declaration and the filesystem dosen't 
> match. Why not apply the same in D?