void size

[Jarrett Billingsley]

"Deewiant" <deewiant.doesnotlike.spam at gmail.com> wrote in message 
news:f31fg3$57$1 at digitalmars.com...
>
> Yes, it is supposed to happen. I can't find a Walter quote or 
> documentation for
> it, but IIRC void.sizeof is defined as 1 in order for void arrays to work 
> properly.
>

I want to say it's defined as the smallest addressable type on the system. 
Like you said, I don't remember where that was mentioned.