class template as a type

[Frits van Bommel]

Jarrett Billingsley wrote:
> "Karl" <asdf at asdf.com> wrote in message 
> news:fcsokc$2uhn$1 at digitalmars.com...
> 
>> "You could give your template class a non-templated base function, and
>> use that as the type of the array elements."
>>
>> I didn't understood. A small example please.
> 
> He meant "non-templated base *class*".  So:

Yes I did. I'm not quite sure how I managed to typo 'class' to 
'function' though...