-L-ldl needed on Linux

[Unknown W. Brackets]

Isn't this what the "lib" pragma is for, if you don't want to have to 
pass it?

-[Unknown]


Bill Baxter wrote:
> Just wondering why I have to give dsss the -L-ldl flag manually when I 
> compile a Derelict-using program under Linux.
> 
> Seems like it shouldn't be neecessary for me to have to specify that. 
> But who's to blame?
> * Is it DMD's fault for not including in the default link libs?
> * Is it DSSS's fault for not picking up that it's needed (or for not 
> puttin it in the default list of flags?)
> * Is it Derelict's fault for somehow not telling DSSS that it wants to 
> use libdl on Linux?
> 
> Any of those seem possible.  So anyone know the answer?
> 
> Or is it just my fault for thinking I shouldn't have to stick a 
> version(linux) block in my dsss.conf file?
> 
> --bb