Silly question

[Jarrett Billingsley]

"janderson" <askme at me.com> wrote in message 
news:fuorvl$2j02$1 at digitalmars.com...

> They are however in my book this is plain wrong.  The whole purpose of 
> being able to hide abstraction layers is broken.  I should be able to 
> protect inherited functions from objects that work on that level.  Its a 
> fundamental principle in C++.

What?

Am I the only one who can't understand what this post means?