classes allocated on the stack

[Steven Schveighoffer]

"Frits van Bommel" wrote
> Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
>>     * use new with no arguments
> [snip]
>> Why does rule 3 exist?  If I have a class:
> [snip]
>>
>> What about using the constructor with parameters makes it not possible to 
>> store on the stack?
>
> "New with arguments" != "constructor with parameters". I think you missed 
> this part of the spec: 
> <http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/class.html#ClassAllocator>

Ah yes, I hadn't thought of it meaning that.  Another case of the example 
not being explicit enough :)  It would be nice if the counter example (with 
an example of new with arguments) was listed.  I'll post an enhancement 
report.

Thanks!

-Steve