alias syntax
Jarrett Billingsley
jarrett.billingsley at gmail.com
Sat Aug 1 20:21:01 PDT 2009
On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 11:13 PM, Ellery
Newcomer<ellery-newcomer at utulsa.edu> wrote:
> um, yeah.
>
> Declaration:
> typedef Decl
> alias Decl
> Decl
>
> Decl:
> StorageClasses Decl
> BasicType Declarators ;
> BasicType Declarator FunctionBody
> AutoDeclaration
>
>
> Never mind that's wrong.
>
> but it looks like it should be
>
> alias StorageClasses BasicType Declarator
'Decl' is recursive. So:
alias Decl
can expand to:
alias StorageClasses Decl
which expands to:
alias StorageClasses BasicType Declarators ;
But is this not what you're pointing out? Are you instead taking
issue with the fact that the grammar accepts something like "alias int
foo() {}" whereas the compiler doesn't?
> Looking through declaration.c, I noticed that semantic disallows
> specifically
>
> alias const {blah blah blah}
>
> but not the others.
You mean how the compiler rejects "alias const int x;" but not "alias
static int x;"? That is strange..
More information about the Digitalmars-d-learn
mailing list