Shared Object with DMD v2.031

[Sergey Gromov]

Sun, 2 Aug 2009 11:18:24 +0000 (UTC), teo wrote:

> On Sun, 02 Aug 2009 02:18:28 +0400, Sergey Gromov wrote:
> 
>> My guess is that test.di is exactly the same as test.d because all the
>> functions are small.  Therefore compiling 'dmd prog.d test.di' resolves
>> all symbols statically and the .so is simply not linked.  Does your
>> 'prog' have any unresolved symbols in its symbol table?
> 
> It looks like this is the case. I found following in the symbols:
> 0804b8cc T _D4test6testMeFZi
> 0804b8d8 T _D4test9testClassFiZC4test4Test
> 
> The whole nm output is too long, but if you want I can send it to you.
> 
> When I use the *--undefined-only* option I get:
> $ nm -u prog
> [snip]

All unresolved symbols seem to be in glibc.

I've filed a bug:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3226