Is there a reason for default-int?

[BCS]

Hello Don,

> Simen kjaeraas wrote:
> 
>> Apart from C legacy, is there a reason to assume anything we don't
>> know
>> what
>> is, is an int? Shouldn't the compiler instead say 'unknown type' or
>> something
>> else that makes sense?
> There's now an Error type in the compiler. It's gradually filtering
> its way through the compiler.
> 

ok. Can we s/gradually/rapidly/ ?