druntime
    Hoenir 
    mrmocool at gmx.de
       
    Fri Jan 16 08:41:40 PST 2009
    
    
  
Steven Schveighoffer schrieb:
>> Yeah, officially. But there also is a D1 branch of druntime and there are 
>> even build instructions for 1.x.
>>
>> So why don't they port tango to that D1 version of druntime?
> 
> What is the need?  The very purpose of having druntime in the first place is 
> to have Tango and Phobos share a common runtime.  If Tango is ported to 
> druntime, then Phobos is *still* not compatible because Phobos 1 does not 
> use it.
> 
That's why one needs to rebuild phobos as the guideline states: 
http://www.dsource.org/projects/druntime/wiki/GettingStarted
> Tango's runtime is pretty much exactly like druntime anyways, since druntime 
> is a port of Tango's runtime.
> 
> The only need I forsee is if the druntime 1.0 branch gets some enhancements 
> that Tango needs to use.
> 
> Once Tango for D2 is finished (being worked on, albeit very slowly), then 
> druntime comes into play.
> 
Any clues when this will be finished?
    
    
More information about the Digitalmars-d-learn
mailing list