Inside the switch statement

[BCS]

Hello Ary,

> Saaa wrote:
> 
>>> You missed the alternative syntax to get the same behaviour. But
>>> it's a very subtle difference.
>>> 
>> Do you mean the multiple cases?
>> http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/statement.html#SwitchStatement
> Yes, but make the "multiple cases" the *only* way to make case
> statements fallthrough. That would be the change.
> 

that /does not/ support the use case I have used:


switch(n)
{
case 1:
    some_func();

case 2:
    some_other_func();
}