struct opCmp?

[Derek Parnell]

On Thu, 14 May 2009 18:21:14 -0400, Nick Sabalausky wrote:

> "Lars T. Kyllingstad" <public at kyllingen.NOSPAMnet> wrote in message 
> news:gui4ml$2g0n$1 at digitalmars.com...
>>
>> I think you have to use opEquals to overload ==. opCmp only applies to <, 
>> <=, >, and >=.
>>
> 
> Oh, I figured either opEquals would be defined in terms of opCmp or an 
> overloaded opCmp would imply a new opEquals defined in terms of it, or 
> something like that.

See http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/operatoroverloading.html for actual
list.

-- 
Derek Parnell
Melbourne, Australia
skype: derek.j.parnell