Sharing unlocked, unchanging data between threads?

[Jonathan M Davis]

On Tuesday, August 10, 2010 11:54:06 Jacob Carlborg wrote:
> I though immutable was supposed to be implicitly shared with no need for
> locks or read-write barriers (or what they're called).

Ah. I have no clue that D1 does. I only use D2. There's obviously nothing wrong 
with posting D1 questions here, but most of the discussion and questions around 
here are for D2, so it's probably a good idea to indicate that you're using D1 
when asking a D1-related question.

- Jonathan M Davis