Problems with receive

[Stanislav Blinov]

Stanislav Blinov wrote:

> 
> I'm not sure about Variant part yet (never tried it myself)

Hmm, after some inspection I can say this is an implementation issue.

You'll find that there are cases when what's told in TDPL doesn't work 
(see recent msg[0] or msg.field[0]? in this group, for example). I' for 
example, have just found that receive(OwnerTerminated) doesn't work as 
well. It's just that current dmd and phobos implementations need time to 
catch up TDPL (I know, things often go in reverse, but with D it's not 
the case :) )