Problems with receive

[Sean Kelly]

Stanislav Blinov Wrote:

> Stanislav Blinov wrote:
> 
> > 
> > I'm not sure about Variant part yet (never tried it myself)
> 
> Hmm, after some inspection I can say this is an implementation issue.
> 
> You'll find that there are cases when what's told in TDPL doesn't work 
> (see recent msg[0] or msg.field[0]? in this group, for example). I' for 
> example, have just found that receive(OwnerTerminated) doesn't work as 
> well. It's just that current dmd and phobos implementations need time to 
> catch up TDPL (I know, things often go in reverse, but with D it's not 
> the case :) )

Yeah, sorry about that.  This is fixed in SVN.