pu$�le

[strtr]

== Quote from Jonathan M Davis (jmdavisprog at gmail.com)'s article
> On Sunday 18 July 2010 00:46:36 Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> > I'll file a bug report
> >
> > - Jonathan M Davis
> Wait. That's not the problem. Or at least, that's not the problem that needs to
> be reported. The problem is that we're not compiling with -w. If you compile
> with -w, then statements such as
> scope(failure) continue;
> won't compile due to being unreachable statements. But if you compile with -w,
> then the compiler flags it as an error, and the program fails to compile. So, I
> filed a bug report on the fact that such warnins aren't reported without -w
> (though they would still compile since they're warnings rather than errors):
> http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4482
> Regardless, what you're trying to do is clearly an error, and compiling with -w
> will show that.
> - Jonathan M Davis

This should be upped to a error, as -w only shows it as unreachable(without a line
number:(.
I don't think unreachable code is an error. I often have unreachable code when
debugging.
case default:
assert(false);// temp
...
break;