Memory allocation faile on string concat
Steven Schveighoffer
schveiguy at yahoo.com
Wed Nov 10 11:15:33 PST 2010
On Wed, 10 Nov 2010 14:06:40 -0500, Steven Schveighoffer
<schveiguy at yahoo.com> wrote:
> Just tried it, Appender is actually slower. This *is* a problem, it
> should be way faster than builtin array appending.
>
> I will look into it.
More data, Appender taking an array of elements is significantly slower
than taking a single element (by an order of magnitude).
I'll try to figure out why.
BTW, if you append individual wchars instead of a string of a single
wchar, Appender does beat the pants off of builtin appends.
-Steve
More information about the Digitalmars-d-learn
mailing list