effect of a label on following block

[Stewart Gordon]

On 16/11/2010 15:11, Nick Voronin wrote:
<snip>
> There is still correct but unexpected behaviour. I found this on bugtracker
> http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=199
> The rationale was "I don't want to change this because it could break
> existing code,
> and there doesn't seem to be a compelling reason to do so." Well. :(
<snip>

True, but that does nothing to explain why it was defined this way in 
the first place.

Stewart.