override '.' member access
Simen kjaeraas
simen.kjaras at gmail.com
Tue Jan 25 16:06:00 PST 2011
spir <denis.spir at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 01/25/2011 10:29 PM, Simen kjaeraas wrote:
>> spir <denis.spir at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> Cannot find corresponding opSomething method, if any. (opDispatch
>>> seems to
>>> specialise for method call.)
>>> Else, how to catch obj.member?
>>
>> opDispatch is likely what you want. with the @property annotation, it
>> will readily support obj.member; and obj.member = foo; syntax.
>
> Thank you, Simen, i'll try using opDispatch with @property. But I'm not
> sure how to write that concretely. My use case is of a type holding a
> string[AnyThing] AA called symbols. Then, I wish to map
> obj.id
> to
> obj.symbols["id"]
> (hope I'm clear)
I just found that it is, in fact, unpossible. That is, you can support
either a = foo.id; or foo.id = a; - not both. This is caused by bug 620:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=620
--
Simen
More information about the Digitalmars-d-learn
mailing list