Constructor template -- bug?

[Bekenn]

On 3/1/2011 11:47 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
>
> I should also point out that there is absolutely no need to use template for
> what you're trying to do. Just declare the constructor like so:
>
> this(string message, string file = __FILE__, size_t line = __LINE__ Throwable
> next = null) { ... }

You are absolutely right; silly me.  I'd assumed that would pick up the 
file and line at the point of declaration...