Overriding iteration
Simen kjaeraas
simen.kjaras at gmail.com
Fri Mar 4 08:43:11 PST 2011
Magnus Lie Hetland <magnus at hetland.org> wrote:
> From what I understand, when you override iteration, you can either
> implement the basic range primitives, permitting foreach to
> destructively iterate over your object, or you can implement a custom
> method that's called, and that must perform the iteration. The
> destructiveness of the first option can, of course, be mitigated if you
> use a struct rather than a class, and make sure that anything that would
> be destroyed by popFront() is copied.
>
> What I'm wondering is whether there is a way to do what Python does --
> to construct/return an iterator (or, in this case, a range) that is used
> during the iteration, rather than the object itself?
>
> I'm thinking about when you iterate directly over the object here. As
> far as I can see, the solution used in the std.container is to use
> opSlice() for this functionality. In other words, in order to iterate
> over container foo, you need to use foreach(e; foo[])? Is there no way
> to get this functionality directly (i.e., for foreach(e; foo))?
foreach ( e; foo ) {}
Should work. I believe there is a bug already filed on it not working.
--
Simen
More information about the Digitalmars-d-learn
mailing list