Building DSFML2? (64-bit Linux)

[Sean Eskapp]

== Quote from Jonathan M Davis (jmdavisProg at gmx.com)'s article
> On Friday, March 18, 2011 18:58:49 Sean Eskapp wrote:
> > == Quote from Jonathan M Davis (jmdavisProg at gmx.com)'s article
> >
> > > On Friday, March 18, 2011 17:56:44 Sean Eskapp wrote:
> > > > I've been trying for weeks to build the D bindings of SFML2,
but
> >
> > with
> >
> > > > little success. The main issue is that I get a myriad of
linker
> >
> > errors
> >
> > > > (documented at http://www.sfml-dev.org/forum/viewtopic.php?
> >
> > p=28345#28345),
> >
> > > > but I can't figure out what linking options would solve
them.
> > > >
> > > > Can anybody shed some light on this?
> > >
> > > Just glancing at it, it looks like you might be missing
pthreads,
> >
> > though that
> >
> > > would be pretty weird. You don't normally need to specify -
> >
> > lpthread. But those
> >
> > > symbols sure look like they're likely pthread-related.
> > > - Jonathan M Davis
> >
> > I've tried -lpthread and -lm, and neither seemed to help. Is it
> > possible there are platform issues, since D (to my knowledge) is
32-
> > bit, and I'm 64-bit?
> Well, as of dmd 2.052, if you pass -m64 to dmd, it'll compile in
64-bit on
> Linux, but if you don't pass it -m64 (or if you explicitly pass it
-m32), it
> will compile in 32-bit. And if it's compiling in 32-bit, then you
need the 32-
> bit versions of whatever libraries that you're using. pthread is
one of them.
> So, if you don't have a 32-bit version of pthread installed, then
that would
> explain it.
> - Jonathan M Davis

Perfect, thanks!