FastCGI binding or implementation?

[Adam Ruppe]

Jacob Carlborg:
> Why not just cache the generated HTML and let Apache handle it.

That sounds hard... configuring Apache to do anything beyond the most
trivial of tasks is a huge pain to me.

It is easy to call "cgi.setCache(true);" though.

> Then it doesn't even need to start the application if the cache is
> available.

It's better with a client side cache. If it's available, you don't
have to go to the server at all!


Server side caching is something I haven't done yet; it's never
been useful to me.