.di files have implementation??

[Nick Sabalausky]

"Andrej Mitrovic" <andrej.mitrovich at gmail.com> wrote in message 
news:mailman.333.1319338819.24802.digitalmars-d-learn at puremagic.com...
> It could also be considered a little bit dangerous. E.g. you could
> forget to regenerate header files after compilation and potentially
> leave the user code with an old function body.

...Or specify different compilation options (like version identifiers) when 
generating the lib/di versus when building your app. Which could leave a 
chimera of a module, a module built partially with one configuration and 
partially with another.