Why can't templates with default arguments be instantiated without the bang syntax?
Andrej Mitrovic
andrej.mitrovich at gmail.com
Thu Sep 15 07:46:24 PDT 2011
struct Foo(T = int) {}
void main()
{
Foo foo; // fail
Foo!() bar; // ok
}
It would be very convenient to be able to default to one type like this.
For example, in CairoD there's a Point structure which takes doubles
as its storage type, and then there's PointInt that takes ints. The
reason they're not both a template Point() that takes a type argument
is because in most cases the user will use the Point structure with
doubles, and only in rare cases Point with ints. So to simplify code
one doesn't have to write Point!double in all of their code, but
simply Point.
If the bang syntax wasn't required in presence of default arguments
then these workarounds wouldn't be needed.
More information about the Digitalmars-d-learn
mailing list