const overload

[so]

On Fri, 23 Sep 2011 23:27:02 +0300, Jonathan M Davis <jmdavisProg at gmx.com>  
wrote:

> On Friday, September 23, 2011 23:19:15 so wrote:
>> Hello everyone.
>>
>> I asked this a few times with no response.
>> Could anyone explain me what is the rational behind this?
>> Why it won't distinguish mutable overload from immutable as in C++?
>
> That compiles fine with the lastest dmd from git. Is it not compiling  
> with the
> latest release (dmd 2.055)?
>
> - Jonathan M Davis

It compiles fine but the result troubling, wouldn't you expect:

fun
fun const

as a result? This is how it works in C++.