How do formally you call the 'in' operator?

Jonathan M Davis jmdavisProg at gmx.com
Sat Sep 24 14:13:06 PDT 2011


On Saturday, September 24, 2011 20:37:45 Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
> Oh wait, I've just realized that opIn is actually the old way of using
> that operator. The new way is using opBinary and string matching
> instead. This is already described in the docs.
> 
> I guess opIn and opIn_r are going away?

Yes.

- Jonathan M Davis


More information about the Digitalmars-d-learn mailing list