Up to date documentation on D implementation.

[H. S. Teoh]

On Fri, Apr 06, 2012 at 12:42:57AM +0200, ReneSac wrote:
> On Thursday, 5 April 2012 at 22:07:05 UTC, Jesse Phillips wrote:
[...]
> Anyway, GDC seems to have quite better performance/optimization, so
> I may end up using it... But I also heard bad things about it in old
> posts... so...

I use GDC for some of my D projects. I didn't find anything wrong with
it. Plus, GCC's backend optimizer is a LOT better than dmd. Something to
consider if you're writing performance-critical code.


T

-- 
Right now I'm having amnesia and deja vu at the same time. I think I've
forgotten this before.