Range of random numbers

[bearophile]

travert at phare.normalesup.org:

> That looks like a workarround, not meaningful code.

It wasn't terrible code :-)


> How about
>   return repeat(_ =>uniform(lower, upper)).map!(x => x())();
> ?

Why don't you write a little benchmark to compare the performance 
of the two versions?

Using uniform(lower, upper, gen)  with
auto gen = Xorshift(1);
to reduce influence from the random generator.

Bye,
bearophile