contracts in interfaces

[Ali Çehreli]

On 12/14/2012 12:11 AM, Yann wrote:

 >>> why does this produce a segmentation fault when executed:

There are quite a few bugs about interface contracts and inherited 
contracts:

   http://d.puremagic.com/issues/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=interface+contract

Although, I haven't seen one about segmentation faults though.

 > //why do I have to add "!(false)", even though it's the default value?
 > Graph g = new AdjacencyListGraph!(false)(5);

With struct and class templates, what you currently need to add is the 
template parameter list, even if empty:

     Graph g = new AdjacencyListGraph!()(5);

That may change in the future.

Ali