Anti-OOP... stupid?

[Timon Gehr]

On 02/15/2012 03:30 PM, foobar wrote:
> ...
> 1. D templates are an enhanced version of C++ templates which are a poor
> design. The problem stems IMO not from issues with OOP but rather with
> the horrible idea of C++-like templates. Other languages have *much*
> better solutions which integrate better.
>
> [snip.]

Please elaborate. What kind of construct in a language that supports OO 
solves the same set of problems D templates do and is unequivocally a 
better design?