Everything on the Stack

[Don Clugston]

On 21/02/12 12:12, Timon Gehr wrote:
> On 02/21/2012 11:27 AM, Daniel Murphy wrote:
>> scope/scoped isn't broken, they're just not safe. It's better to have an
>> unsafe library feature than an unsafe language feature.
>>
>>
>
> scope is broken because it is not enforced by the means of
> flow-analysis. As a result, it is not safe. Copying it to the library
> and temporarily disabling 'scope' for classes is a good move however,
> because this means we will be able to fix it at an arbitrary point in
> the future without additional code breakage.

Does the library solution actually work the same as the language solution?