LDC -noruntime
BLM768
blm768 at gmail.com
Fri Jul 6 07:37:04 PDT 2012
On Friday, 6 July 2012 at 09:38:13 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
> On 2012-07-06 08:53, BLM768 wrote:
>> I've been trying to write an OS kernel in D, and I'm having
>> issues with
>> the runtime. I'm trying to use LDC's -noruntime option, which
>> is
>> _supposed_ to prevent any runtime calls from being generated,
>> but the
>> linker keeps complaining about unresolved references to
>> _d_assert_msg
>> and other runtime functions. It seems that LDC is ignoring the
>> switch
>> and is generating runtime references anyway. Is there some
>> other way to
>> force it to stop trying to pull in the runtime? I'd rather not
>> have to
>> create/link a custom runtime at this point; I don't even have
>> a memory
>> allocator written, so I really don't want to mess with a
>> runtime yet.
>
> I'm pretty sure that the only thing the -noruntime flag does is
> preventing the runtime from being linked. It will not prevent
> the compiler for generating calls to the runtime.
>
> So if you see calls to runtime functions you need to stub them
> out as Alex suggested or try to find a way to avoid them. Note
> that the compiler will link with the standard library by
> default as well. I don't know if the -noruntime flag prevents
> that.
The output of the --help switch suggested that it would actually
keep LDC from generating the calls, but I guess not. Looks like
I've got a rumtime to stub out. At least I'll understand it
better when I'm done.
More information about the Digitalmars-d-learn
mailing list