LDC -noruntime
1100110
10equals2 at gmail.com
Fri Jul 6 14:52:25 PDT 2012
I swear you guys read my mind sometimes... It's creepy.
I just had this very issue, doing the exact same thing, about an hour ago.
Have you tried with -nodefaultlib -noruntime ? Cause that's what works
for me...
I just got *something* to compile with no runtime or std.
Whether or not it actually does anything remains to be seen.
On Fri, 06 Jul 2012 01:53:10 -0500, BLM768 <blm768 at gmail.com> wrote:
> I've been trying to write an OS kernel in D, and I'm having issues with
> the runtime. I'm trying to use LDC's -noruntime option, which is
> _supposed_ to prevent any runtime calls from being generated, but the
> linker keeps complaining about unresolved references to _d_assert_msg
> and other runtime functions. It seems that LDC is ignoring the switch
> and is generating runtime references anyway. Is there some other way to
> force it to stop trying to pull in the runtime? I'd rather not have to
> create/link a custom runtime at this point; I don't even have a memory
> allocator written, so I really don't want to mess with a runtime yet.
--
Using Opera's revolutionary email client: http://www.opera.com/mail/
More information about the Digitalmars-d-learn
mailing list