Stack overflow

[Jonathan M Davis]

On Monday, June 25, 2012 10:18:19 Namespace wrote:
> > If you don't need to use any compile-time reflection on the
> > type itself (i.e.
> > you just need its name), you can use a string mixin.
> > 
> > - Jonathan M Davis
> 
> You mean i should pack the whole mixin template in a string?
> Isn't that a little bit ugly?

More or less yeah. You generate the code as a string and then mix it in. As 
it's a string, it's really easy to manipulate, and if you lay out the strings 
properly, it's not really even particularly hard to read. Personally, I never 
use template mixins, and I get the impression that string mixins get used a 
lot more than template mixins do.

- Jonathan M Davis